The Challenge
EGADS ran a sign-making plant and tracked production the hard way: which products were in progress, how many hours each employee had put into them, and where jobs were stuck. Management had no consolidated view and no way to know about a problem until someone walked over and said so. I built the system that replaced that, across two Robert Half Technology engagements in 2005 and 2006.
Key Pain Points:
- Product and employee-hour tracking handled manually on the plant floor
- No consolidated reporting for management on production status or labor
- No alerting when a job stalled or a threshold was crossed
My Solution
1. Production Tracking
A custom .NET application over SQL Server that tracked each product through the plant and recorded the employee hours against it, replacing the manual process.
2. Reporting and Alerting
- Detailed reporting for management on production status, throughput, and labor
- An alerting system that flagged production issues instead of waiting for someone to notice
Technical Implementation
Key Technologies
Application
.NET / ASP.NET C# / VB.NETDatabase
SQL Server Stored ProceduresFeatures
Product Tracking Employee-Hour Tracking Reporting AlertingResults & Impact
- Product and employee-hour tracking, reporting, and alerts ran from one system instead of paper and memory
- Management could see production status and labor without asking the floor
- The client brought me back for a second, longer engagement to extend the system
What This Means for AI Implementation
The EGADS work is the same shape as most of today's automation requests: replace a manual process with a system that tracks, reports, and alerts. The difference now is that agents and private assistants can sit on top of that data.